Grief, Gratitude and Meaning in Dying

arapahoe county probate

Denver Botanic Gardens in July

 

Okay, maybe you were looking for an upbeat happy-faced Thanksgiving post from me? Well, I have advised clients and written in blog posts that it is a great time to have “the conversation” about end of life wishes when family members gather for holidays like. . . Thanksgiving! So here is the themed post for this year’s holiday: grief is part of life and so, part of death – whether it is grief around a life change like a loss of a relationship or status or the loss of a loved one’s or the prospect of losing one’s own life.

Why is this so difficult to talk about? No, I don’t mean this as a rhetorical question, rather as a question to ask each other and ourselves – to discuss individually and collectively in our communities.  The time is right for this.  Medical technology has extended our longevity such that some are now seriously questioning the purpose of such longevity.  I’m thinking of my first Dementia and Memory post of Oct. 1, 2014, where I cite the article “Why I Hope to Die at 75” by Dr. Ezekiel Emanuel.  The obvious answer to the question is that death is a great beyond, an unknown for the vast majority of us.  Reminds me of an observation by my favorite ancient Greek philosopher, Heraclitus:

Whoever cannot seek

The unforeseen sees nothing,

For the known way

Is an impasse.

Fragments, #7 at 7, Brooks Haxton, trans. (2001: Penguin).

Is it because the fear of death is nearly universal?  Ernest Becker, the late anthropologist and author of the 1973 groundbreaking book The Denial of Death, seemed to think so!  This fear is based on the “problem” of the body, how to manage our physical existence and its limitations.  There responses to this come in a myriad of forms: religious, spiritual, moral (philosophy), and ethical – just to name a few.

I would submit that we (as in post-modern American culture) are at an impasse in the debate about death, its meaning and the prospect of suffering as part of the dying process.  Evidence of this is clear from the recent death, via means of doctor assistance, of twenty-nine year old Brittany Maynard.  I find it interesting that the subjects of these types of debate are all young women: Karen Ann Quinlan was 22 when she ingested alcohol with the tranquilizer; Nancy Cruzan was 24 when she was in the auto crash that left her in a “vegetative state;” while Terri Schiavo was 26 when she suffered the heart attack which deprived her brain of oxygen for several minutes.  These are some of the women whose fates have informed the course of development of the law concerning advance medical directives.  What impact will Brittany Maynard’s death have on the state of upheaval surrounding the quality of medical care?  Is this question one that applies across the board to us regardless of our age as adults?

In his article in response to Ms. Maynard and the rising calls for doctor-assisted end of life measures, “Doctor-Assisted Suicide Is Unethical and Dangerous,” Dr. Ira Byock observes

American health care is undergoing tumultuous changes and showing signs of strain. A recent Institute of Medicine report attests to persistent deficiencies in care and social support that seriously ill people and their families experience. Witnessing the suffering of our relatives, friends and, for clinicians, our patients, gives rise to moral distress.  It is not surprising that support for physician-assisted suicide is also rising. The age-old dictum that doctors must not kill patients can appear antiquated, out of touch with hard realities, and even heartless.

One way to look at the euthanasia is as some kind of triumph over the tyranny of death, in that means can be selected to hasten its progress so as to minimize suffering.  But this really begs the question – it is the challenge of meaning, in how we live our lives as well as how we choose to die.

We even speak about death in physical terms – as a wall, a door or a window. Is our imaginative vocabulary so limited?  Why is it we have such a difficult time in grappling with the question of meaning in our life – is it because we do not wish to contemplate it in light of its physical end, our mortality? Or is the question backwards?  I find an observation by Miguel de Unamuno in The Tragic Sense of Life helpful here:

In the most secret recess of the spirit of the man who believes that death will put an end to his personal consciousness and even to his memory forever, in that inner recess, even without his knowing it perhaps, a shadow hovers, a vague shadow lurks, a shadow of the shadow of uncertainty, and, while he tells himself: “There’s nothing for it but to live this passing life, for there is no other!” at the same time he hears, in this most secret recess, his own doubt murmur: “Who knows? . . . . ”  He is not sure he hears aright, but he hears.

It seems that a major strand of euthanasia seems to presuppose that there is no meaning in the dying process, that it is simply needless suffering.  This is the question that is not addressed by euthanasia, this is the fear that is laid bare and yet still rejected.

And what if true mastery is not based upon the art of living fully, deliberately and mindfully – but rather on the art of dying well?  Indeed, I would say that is an excellent topic for another blog post.  So if you think gratitude is an important expression of being in the world, whether through your heart or your mind or both – I wish you a Happy Thanksgiving!

©Barbara Cashman 2014   www.DenverElderLaw.org

The High Price of Death Denial

Highlands Ranch probate

Fall Colors near Pine

My best friend in Sacramento sent me a link yesterday morning about (Dr.) Atul Gawande’s latest book:  Being Mortal: Medicine and What Matters in the End.  Thanks Liz!   This title is also inspired by a couple other occurrences too – Halloween and Day of the Dead are approaching soon and this weekend I will be going up for a training flight in a spiffy Cirrus SR22.

I tend to equate thinking about death and practicing dying a little every day (letting go of attachments to what appears to be the status quo) with being alive.  Some folks would question my orientation, but I believe thinking about our mortality is far from morose and gloomy, rather it reminds us that our time here is limited and precious!  Death denial has all kinds of costs associated with it.  Because I am a lawyer, I am more familiar with the legal aspects of denying death (it won’t happen to me, you can’t make me decide what I want, etc.) but there are manifold aspects.

So, I’ll get back on track with Dr. Gawande’s latest book.  No, I haven’t ordered it yet, but I did watch the clip from his interview by Jon Stewart on The Daily Show.  I liked the interview, which was a great overview of the present-day dilemma of aging Americans.

What I found refreshing was that Dr. Gawande was looking carefully at how doctors ask their patients questions about health care values, medical wishes and end-of-life choices.  One might think this is common for doctors, but it is sadly quite uncommon, unless you are talking about the palliative or hospice care docs.  Dr. Gawande had personal experience to draw on for his writing – with his mother-in-law and also his father, who went to hospice care.  But there is still much resistance among doctors (even those who would choose hospice care for themselves) to discuss hospice and palliative care with a patient.

A few things came to mind after watching the short clip.  First, I will continue my policy of pressing further when a client states “my son is a doctor, so he can make these difficult choices for me” – with my response that medical know-how does not translate into emotional capacity to make difficult decisions on another’s behalf.  Next, his observation that it is anxiety about our death which cripples us and leads us to bad decisions.  This cries out for attention in the form of a readily available fix . . . .  click here for helpful materials in pdf format from The Conversation Project (I’ve already run out of them at my office)!  Lastly, the importance of advance planning – at minimum a medical durable power of attorney along with a discussion of wishes with the selected agent – is best done when someone is healthy and well, before the scary subject of end of life care is actually on one’s medical radar.  If we can somehow “normalize” this conversation about dying, we can neutralize much of the anxiety around this topic.

Beyond the emotional costs are also the financial and ethical costs.  In the past we sometimes called these measures heroic, but the connotation was misleading at best.  The term used now is “futile.”  What is the definition of “futility” in medical terms?  Here’s a helpful article from the Mayo Clinic with some contextual definitions of the term.  Over the past several years, much has been made of a perceived government agenda concerning “rationing” of care, but is it the government’s responsibility to decide how much or what kind of heath care we receive?  Is it our doctor’s responsibility to decide if we aren’t prepared to make a decision? No and no! It is our own responsibility to decide, for ourselves and to our loved ones, especially when we do not wish either to be a burden or to be tortured.

How do we make those difficult decisions when we are incapable? Well, if we have a medical power of attorney, that is best place to start. We can also execute advance directives to help solidify the wishes we have communicated to our agent and other loved ones.  Our collective inability to have “the conversation” about health care and end of life wishes costs us dearly – both the patient who didn’t choose in advance and our community, which must collectively bear the cost of such care.

So I will close this post with the theme of festivals and holidays honoring the dead, here are a few of them:

  1. Halloween
  2. Memorial Day (originally known as Decoration Day)
  3. El Dia de los Muertos (Day of the Dead) (the Mexican version of #4)
  4. All Saints’ Day and All Souls’ Day (Catholic)
  5. Bon Festival (Japan)
  6. Chuseok (South Korea)
  7. Gaijatra (Nepal)
  8. Qingming Festival (China)
  9. Pitru Paksha (Hindu)

This list is neither authoritative nor exhaustive.  Bottom line here for purposes of this list – remember the dead by honoring life in the here and know and by expressing love to those you care about while you are able (including having “the conversation” and getting documents in place to memorialize it)!

 ©Barbara Cashman  2014   www.DenverElderLaw.org

 

Dementia and Memory: Out of Time, Out of Mind I

Mount Hope Cemetery, Rochester NY

Mount Hope Cemetery, Rochester NY

So I’m back to that rather slippery theme of memory again – this is the first of two parts. The online Merriam-Webster defines memory as: (1) the power or process of remembering what has been learned; (2) something that is remembered; and (3) the things learned and kept in the mind.  This all sounds very quantitative and linear to me, right in line with most conventional thinking about memory as factual recall, that forensic memory which is objectively measurable.  I think the definition of memoria from the ancient Greeks is more useful and inclusive of the human experience.  Conveniently, it also encompasses the non-chronological aspect of time about which I’ve written before – kairos.  We modern Americans come to think of memory in some fairly odd contexts, like computer memory and we often liken what’s in our heads to our personal hard drive as if it were some kind of data storage system – which it is of course in a very narrow sense.  This also accounts for much of our recent “de-mentation” or offloading many of the factual details of our daily lives like calendars, phone numbers and emails to our smartphones.  So what is the nature of memory in our minds? Is the memory of our heads different from the memory of our hearts?

The Atlantic Monthly recently featured the article “Why I Hope to Die at 75,” by Ezekiel Emanuel, physician and bioethicist.  The message he states is one I have offered to clients many times: longevity has a down side, a dark side potentially in the form of a “gray area” of diminishing cognitive capacity, perceived “uselessness” and for many of us, dementia.  I think the article is an important counter point to our death-denying and youth-glorifying mainstream culture that tends to view aging as a long process of descent from some place in the prime of our adult lives, along a journey where things can only get worse.  But this article that states emphatically – 75 is long enough.  This sounds a bit like some of my Baby Boomer age mates – who having lived through a parent’s dementia – proclaim they want an advance directive that has a box which states something like “if I get dementia and need Depends, just shoot me.”  Don’t get me wrong, I applaud Dr. Emanuel’s message on several different levels in which it challenges conventional wisdom and the misplaced faith our culture has in our medical-industrial complex to keep our lives extended (not accounting for quality or purpose), but I think it misses the mark.  Because babies are delivered via scheduled Caesarean section, does that mean we can cash in our chips at a scheduled time as well?  I think not!

We are re-negotiating the tightrope of what we believe we control and what we do not control as it affects our lifespan in our old age (just as in any other stage of life, but perhaps with less baggage).  We have become used to so many answers from the medical establishment that when we have this unprecedented number of elders facing dementia and/or incapacity, we are likely to simply “declare war,” spend lots of money and turn to big Pharma for some “fix” of our “problem.”  The drug companies are more than willing to oblige and provide us with a pill to help assuage our fears, and yet another tool to interrogate the one with the slipping memory . . .  “did you remember to take your pills today?”  It often seems like an elder can’t exist as such without some kind of medical intervention!

Evident in Dr. Emanuel’s insightful article is the denial of the slowing down associated with old age (read the account of the aftermath of his father’s heart attack).  I contrast this with what the late psychologist James Hillman wrote about in The Force of Character.  In chapter nine, entitle “Leaving,” Hillman describes the conflict between his sixty-six year-old patient and her nonagenarian mother, for whom she supervised care.  The patient was continually frustrated with her mother’s inability and seeming unwillingness to be principally concerned with the factual details of forensic-based (often short term because it involves daily functioning) memory.  Hillman observes (at 88) that he saw this mother daughter conflict as exemplifying “the difference between short-term and long-term memory.  It is as if you cannot have both at once.  One has to give way to the other.”  The chapter provides useful insight into the “life review” stage of elderhood which is gaining wider acceptance as a part of life, not just a loss of the familiar ways of doing from pre-retirement adulthood.  I think it is one of the centerpieces of connected and engaged elderhood.   Hillman closes it with the following questions, so often neglected:

Why do the dark days of the past lighten up in late recollection?  Is this a subtle hint that the soul is letting go of the weights it has been carrying, preparing to lift off more easily?  Is this a premonition of what religious traditions call heaven, this euphoric tone now coating many of the worst experiences, so that there is little left to forgive?  At the end the unforgiveables will never be forgiven, because in old age they do not need to be forgiven: they simply have been forgotten.  Forgetting, that marvel of the old mind, may actually be the truest form of forgiveness, and a blessing.

Hillman, The Force of Character at 93.

This observation brings me back to the rhetorical or existential question I posed in my previous blogpost about what is remembering and what is forgetting.  Hillman weaves that question into a life’s span.  I will close this first post with a poem: Walt Whitman’s poem “Whispers of Heavenly Death”

Whispers of heavenly death, murmur’d I hear;
Labial gossip of night—sibilant chorals;
Footsteps gently ascending—mystical breezes, wafted soft and low;
Ripples of unseen rivers—tides of current, flowing, forever flowing;
(Or is it the plashing of tears? the measureless waters of human tears?)

I see, just see, skyward, great cloud-masses;
Mournfully, slowly they roll, silently swelling and mixing;
With, at times, a half-dimm’d, sadden’d, far-off star,
Appearing and disappearing.

Some parturition, rather— some solemn, immortal birth:
On the frontiers, to eyes impenetrable,
Some Soul is passing over.

The Complete Poems of Walt Whitman (1995: Wordsworth) at 328.

To be continued . . . .

©Barbara Cashman  2014   www.DenverElderLaw.org

Aging, Meaning and Memory

Medicine Bow National Forest

Medicine Bow National Forest

This is another contemplative post – so please forgive me.   I am preparing for a retreat on this exquisite topic of memory. . . . !   Since I find the topic of spirituality and dementia fascinating, I have been reading “Finding Meaning in the Experience of Dementia: The Place of Spiritual Reminiscence Work,” written by Elizabeth MacKinlay and Corinne Trevitt (published in 2012).  I especially enjoyed reading chapter ten “Grief is part of Life,” that speaks to much of my estate planning work with elders and their loved ones.  It begins:

Loss of relationship either through death or through geographical separation is closely tied to the meaning of life.  Meaning does not cease to exist because a person is dying; in fact, it is in facing death that it can be possible, perhaps for the first time, to see the meaning of one’s life.

Finding Meaning in the Experience of Dementia: The Place of Spiritual Reminiscence Work at 171.

Is our memory informed by our experiences and accordingly limited to our perception alone, or do we have the ability to further construct the memory so as to make it a memory of our whole being, as opposed to some event recalled which can be verified by another?  Therein lies some of the quantity versus quality aspects of memory . . .  but I am focusing today on this topic of memory in the context of aging and meaning.

So much of our important grief work is pushed aside in our death-denying and youth-glorifying culture.  I think this is a big part of the anxiety and depression and despair that so many of us struggle with in our culture because we do not see or otherwise recognize the inherent meaning of loss of youth and dying and death.

Memory is a phenomenon that is both individual and collective.  So to whom does memory belong or to whom should it be attributed?  What part of cognitive decline implicates memory and what is it that we are talking about when we use this term “cognitive decline?”  This can of course be age-associated and within “normal” limits or it can be identified with a disease process, such as the course of dementia of different types.  How do we distinguish the aging process that occurs naturally and that leads inevitably to our death from that process associated with a disease?  This may seem like a straightforward question – but I think it is far from that!  When aging becomes inextricably linked with decline in a way that is viewed as a disease process, we are essentially denying death, killing it off as the culmination of life and viewing the whole aging process and our mortality as a disease, some kind of shortcoming in our biology. If you think I am exaggerating about his, do a search on Aubrey de Grey and his so-called longevity science. . .

Dementia can further complicate a grief process as well.  Even the term “anticipatory grief” sometimes used for grief for the loss of a loved one with dementia before they die – the loss of relationship and the outward self – implicated the complexity of the grief process and the context for the grieving of surviving loved ones.

So now I will turn to the third aspect of this post’s title – memory – to connect the aging and meaning aspects.  What is memory?  Aldous Huxley wrote that “every man’s memory is his private literature.”  In “The Life of Reason,” George Santayana stated that “memory itself is an internal rumor.”  In this respect, we could say, that the memory belongs to the person.  But what about the memory that we share – isn’t that memory too?

What is it that we see and that we call memory?  In “The Marriage of Heaven and Hell,” the poet William Blake observed “If the doors of perception were cleansed every thing would appear to man as it is, Infinite. For man has closed himself up, till he sees all things thro’ narrow chinks of his cavern.”

So does memory free us from the constriction of our lives or does it enslave us to our experience of things past?

It seems that once again, I have asked far too many questions than could be answered in a blog post (or perhaps even a lifetime?!) and with that said, I’ll conclude with Friedrich Nietzsche’s observation that “the existence of forgetting has never been proved: we only know that some things don’t come to mind when we want them.”   Yes, there will be more on this topic . . .

©Barbara Cashman  2014   www.DenverElderLaw.org

Have You Had the Conversation Yet?

Shadow Selfie

Shadow Selfie

Yesterday morning I attended an informative program put on by the Colorado Guardianship Alliance (of which I am a member) which featured palliative care specialist Dr. Hillary Lum, speaking on Advance Care Planning, Palliative Care and Hospice.  I recently posted a short blog which featured an interactive meeting put on by the Life Quality Institute which featured The Conversation Project.  I returned from the meeting with a helpful booklet that is loaded with end-of-life facts and which can be used to facilitate the conversation which most of us say is really important to have (about end-of-life wishes) but that the majority of us have not yet had with a loved one.  I met with new clients this afternoon and was able to give one of the booklets to them, so I will be able to hear how it may help them have the conversation and communicate wishes with their adult children.  I’ll keep you posted.

By the time you get to be “a certain age” (okay, I’m celebrating a 50-something birthday next week, so please pardon attention), you have most likely had some experience with a chronic or terminal illness of a loved one or a death of a family member that did not die a good death.  Yes, I said good death.  Death is part of life, is contained within life and so I think if we can talk about quality of life we can also talk about quality of death.

Palliative care and hospice care focus on the still much misunderstood concept of quality of life medical care.  Remember the “death panels?!”  I don’t know where people come up with this stuff, but there are folks who think they exist . . .  maybe we’ve watched too many B movies of the sci-fi genre! Here’s a great post by a palliative care doc about those nonexistent faceless federal bureaucrats.  Dr. Lum (getting back to my original topic now) spoke succinctly about the distinctions between palliative care and hospice care.  She shared a great resource called “fast facts” – you can google eperc fast facts and get the Medical College of Wisconsin’s really informative website.  Fast Facts and Concepts provides concise, practical, peer-reviewed, and evidence-based summaries on key topics important to clinicians and trainees caring for patients facing life-limiting illnesses.  It has straightforward descriptions and answers a lot of questions you may not have known to ask about palliative and hospice care and the medical issues attendant to things you might ask your doctor about.

So while I’m on the topic of resources relating to advance planning, the ABA just published its August issue of Bifocal which features as its lead article “Advance Care Planning in a Nutshell.”  Sabatino focuses on the two most basic question we need to tackle early on in the process: (1) Who do you select as a capable, competent and conscientious health care agent (a/k/a surrogate decision-maker); and (2) What kind of information and guidance can I provide to that person and perhaps other loved ones about what I want and what I don’t want in this context.  For some of us, these questions are not so difficult, we may think “my kids already know what I want” or “my spouse is a good mind reader” – but then there is the rest of us!  We may think it’s not good enough to be general and not so detailed about our wishes, that this kind of conversation or documentation requires a fine-tooth comb.  Not so!  While it’s true I recently purchased a crystal ball, I have yet to perfect my skills at predicting the manner and circumstances of a client’s death (hey, wasn’t that an X-Files episode, back a few years?).

One of the reasons that lots of details about end-of-life wishes aren’t really helpful or required – even if we have a chronic illness that limits our life, is that we cannot know all the details around how we would want another to choose in the event we were unable to choose or couldn’t communicate.  Hence, the focus on values and priorities, to let the big picture of what is important to you guide the conversation – and not let it get bogged down in details that will probably never apply.  I think you’re getting my drift now, that it’s a good idea to inform your health care agent about those three aspects of making informed health care decisions: consider the risk, the burden along with the benefit – and how they play out in the context of your values about health care.

I will close with this – while our culture and the American medical-industrial complex has a ways to travel in terms of getting more folks educated about quality of life focused care at the end of life, the Project on Death in America is helping make serious headway in getting better attunement toward compassionate care for the dying.

 ©Barbara Cashman 2014   www.DenverElderLaw.org

 

Dementia, Music, Identity and Memory

 

Lantana and Friends

Lantana and Friends

 

Recently my colleague Kristin D. mentioned an NPR story about the Sundance award-winning documentary film “Alive Inside” – she knew I would be interested in it and I did get a chance to see the film at Chez Artiste.  I enjoyed this movie about music that transforms persons with dementia on several different levels.  If you’re curious about it, take a look at the video clip on YouTube that features Henry.  Henry is a resident at a skilled nursing facility (SNF) a/k/a “nursing home” who was, before getting headphones and an iPod loaded with some of his favorite music, mostly withdrawn and typically lost inside himself.

One of the music excerpts featured in the film is a song by Cab Calloway. This clip is a fave of mine (it’s got some pretty tight dance moves by the Nicholas brothers) and the song was covered by Joe Jackson in the 1980’s.  I grew up listening to my parents’ favorites: Ella Fitzgerald (who sang some scat from time to time), Duke Ellington and Oscar Peterson.

This film resonated with me on several different levels.  First, I have personal experience with the sort of “time travel” that music can perform for someone with dementia.  In a post I published about sixteen months ago, I recounted an experience I had while working as a volunteer “para-chaplain” in a SNF.  I had traveled to a local SNF to lead a holiday service for some residents and because I was lucky enough to be accompanied by a guitarist, at the end of the service I sang an old Yiddish song called Oif’n Prippitchik.  About midway into the song something very interesting happened.  One of the residents who attended was a woman with very advanced dementia who, it was reported to me later, had not spoken in over a year.  She started first to hum and then sing along with the song.  She spoke about her grandmother.  The song had transported her right back to a happy memory of childhood, when her grandmother had sung that song to her.  By the means of music, hearing that melody – she was moved in a sort of time travel.  I was most certainly moved witnessing that event.  Another story of music as a means of transport for the spirit comes to mind, it is from Megory Anderson’s book Sacred Dying.

A basic premise of the film is that people are not human machines.  Often what we see on the outside – when someone is old and frail and seems to have lost so much capacity to be the person they once were – is not the real picture or a complete picture.   Even when we see a loved one or a stranger in such a situation, we might shrug and say to ourselves “he’s not the same person anymore” or we may grieve for what that person was and doesn’t appear to be any longer.  We focus on the losses and often ignore what is left, however difficult or challenging it is to recognize.  It is often difficult to see a person there, who remains – despite the label of a diagnosis or condition that changes them.  Doesn’t all of life change all of us?  It made me think of Tom Kitwood and his legacy of person-centered care, based on the idea that people with dementia have much to teach us.  Yes, there’s a blog post I’ve written about that as well.

Whatever it is, it is the being, the timeless in us (identified generally by the neurologist Dr. Oliver Sacks as a part of the brain that is often left intact by dementia’s onslaught and ravages elsewhere)) – that is the place where music reaches through, past all the mechanical breakdowns and plaques and tangles of dementia, of Alzheimer’s or some other variety of dementia.  In the film, it is apparent that the music’s effect on the residents is to re-animate them.  The music gets through in a way that other communication cannot and the music helps the residents re-member, to inhabit their bodies and lives in ways that are astonishing.  Our basic human need to help others who are suffering and withdrawn is met by the residents’ responses.

After I saw the movie I wondered – should our end-of-life preferences, as stated in an advance directive or other documents, list our favorite music choice?  Perhaps a line on the form would ask: what music would you like to hear if/when you get dementia and become remote?  I know the music preference is sometimes done for memorial services . . .  but why wait?!

Perhaps I will write more in the coming months about the wisdom of aging, aging is what we are designed to do as adults – so why is it that our death-denying and youth-glorifying culture diminishes this process and its mysteries, this important stage in life that many of us hope we are lucky enough to encounter, enjoy and pass through?  Does our American culture’s emphasis on individuality and the capacity-focused, independence of the “rugged individualist” sometimes hamper our acquisition of wisdom or does or culture simply place a lower value on it . . .  because wisdom often comes with age and experience?  Here’s an interesting article in The Economist from a couple years back with some insights about culture and wisdom.  Yes, this post has many rhetorical questions!

 ©Barbara Cashman  2014   www.DenverElderLaw.org

Conscious Aging, Memory and Longing

Tex and Barb at Medicine Bow  Lodge & Guest Ranch

Tex and Barb at Medicine Bow Lodge & Guest Ranch

The theme of this post is about remembering and forgetting, for a number of reasons I suppose.  I didn’t forget to publish a post last week, but was absent, away from my everyday for several days, remembering how to ride a horse (hence the picture of me and my trusty mount Tex, a slightly cantankerous nine-year-old gelding who loved to snack on the abundant flowers).  Forgetting often overtakes us on many different levels.

Plato’s fascination with theory was an early way out of the direct experience of being human. Thinking about our human experience is a well-recognized way of distancing ourselves from that experience (even if we don’t think about it in those terms) and is itself a form of forgetting.   Recent works in neuroscience continue to wrestle with the theory of what it is to be conscious.  A recent favorite of mine is Phi: A Voyage From the Brain to the Soul (2012), by professor of psychiatry Giulio Tononi.  His work is well-written and artfully illustrated and I liked especially his chapter 17 entitled “Galileo and the Bat: In which it is feared that the quality of experience cannot be derived from matter.”    In the nine page chapter, Tononi tells the story of the cave (hey, doesn’t that sound like Plato?) and the demise of the bat who was one of its inhabitants.  It is a beautiful illustration that questions how science can describe consciousness – either as a measure or a quality. And further – what can determine it (consciousness) when we humans share the same basic infrastructure or what would seem to be the physical architecture of awareness but that gives rise to so much variation.  Where I part ways with this is in the search for the piece of the brain that contains consciousness, the idea that the quality of consciousness is still determined by some quantity or configuration.  I think this has been previously attempted . . . !

So, if I might suggest an antidote to all these measurable, reducible, objectified search tools, try The Reign of Quantity and Signs of the Times, by Rene Guenon.  I don’t pretend to understand or agree with much of what he had to say, but I do think his point that the immeasurable quality of space is the real space (not the quantifiable space) is refreshing to read and offers much hope for finding a way out of our collective forgetting that plagues so many of us on an individual and collective level.

Another type of forgetting is dis-integration.  This is the reverse of what memory has been described as by Daniel Siegel in Mindsight: Memory is a layering of our experiences which have been processed and encoded, and the integration he describes occurs at a horizontal (left and right brain), vertical (from the lower limbic region up to the cortex), and more subjective integration that includes our personal story, present state of mind, time and the interpersonal element of integration.  The last part – interpersonal integration – Siegel describes as “the ‘we’ of well-being.”  Mindsight, passim at 71-76.

What do we remember and what do we forget? So I return again to the New Yorker article “This Old Man.” In that article, nonagenarian Roger Angell writes beautifully from the heart about being surprised by getting to such an old age, but notes his biggest surprise (#1) is the unceasing need for deep attachment and intimate love.  Based on my reading of his article, I would say the secret to his happiness is longing.  Longing is searching.  As Ravi Ravindra wrote in Pilgrim Without Boundaries:

In being alive to the search, we are alive.

I think this longing, this search is a form of remembering, a remembering of something that is elusive, a connection and not really a memory at all, by the measurement of neuroscience.  Where does it come from?

Another scientist has a different take on why we search and strive to bond with others, particularly in intimate relationships.  In Our Drive to Bond, Bruce Lipton writes about the “fundamental biological imperative that propels you and every organism on this planet to be in a community, to be in relationship with other organisms.”  This type of remembrance is undoubtedly awareness, but obviously on a broad scale indeed, even if it is felt in an acutely personal way.

There are so many ways to address this longing, this remembrance of connection that drives us forward and toward it.  I will close this post with an excerpt from a poem, about our life – looked at as experience that is the long forgetting: This is from William Blake’s Ode (Number 563, Intimations of Immortality from Recollections of Early Childhood, ll. 59-65);

Our birth is but a sleep and a forgetting:

The Soul that rises with us, our life’s Star,

        Hath had elsewhere its setting,

          And cometh from afar:

        Not in entire forgetfulness,

        And not in utter nakedness,

But trailing clouds of glory do we come . . .

You can read the entire Ode here. I’m sure I’ll be back to writing about more practical topics soon, but as the summer blossoms fade and the harvest arrives, I couldn’t pass up this contemplative topic!

 ©Barbara Cashman  2014   www.DenverElderLaw.org

 

Elderhood as a Life Stage: The Power of Naming (part 2)

Roses of a Certain Name

Roses of a Certain Name

Where is this place – old age?  In the first post I looked at the power of naming and how we often use and misuse it in the context of challenges presented by aging.  Here in the second post I will explore the individual and collective means of naming in the context of old age, vulnerability,  elder abuse and other kinds of naming and identity. Did I mention there will be a part three?

One of the losses many elders face is a loss of place, of the previously recognized or accustomed stature and home  – at least in the generally recognized sense of the term (if there even is such a thing).  I have blogged about Eric Erikson’s stages of the life cycle (psychosocial) development and his wife and collaborator Joan Erikson’s addition of the ninth stage when it became apparent that the eighth stage didn’t really cover the breadth of longevity in the context of all the physical challenges and responses to those that an old (80’s-90’s) person and body often faces.  I find it interesting that the ninth stage also denotes a shift in the trust/mistrust pole, where a physically and socially vulnerable elder can come to mistrust their own abilities and capabilities as well as those of the environment in which the elder finds him or herself.

So, instead of asking oneself “what do I want to be when I grow up?” a related question may still be forward-looking – as distinguished from backward-looking, but it involves our continued functioning and capacity.

            •           – Which parts of our selves (including our bodies) and our relationships still work and which don’t?
            •           – What awareness do we have or are capable of having over these losses or compromises?
            •           – Well, what if old age is simply too depressing?

A recent article in The Times of India referred to efforts  by HelpAge, an Indian nongovernmental agency, to identify abuse of the elderly in that country, noting that when the study commenced ten years ago, even elders living with families were very lonely and sad.

So where do we as individuals look for guidance to navigate the terrain of Elderhood?

How do we chart the course collectively and collaboratively as a culture and within the bounds of our legal system?  Well, it depends of course.

I think a big part of it concerns how we address these questions involves our perspective on them  Do we look at elderhood  as a window or elderhood as a mirror?

I will note that the either or setup above might just as easily be a “both and” lineup.

The Mirror.  What is the story we already know of ourselves as we approach that officially recognized age of retirement, 65?  Can we manage to arrive at or transport ourselves to Erikson’s eighth stage which begins at 65?  BTW, the eighth stage – the virtue of which is wisdom, represents in Erikson’s “psycho-social crisis” category that of ego integrity versus despair, the significant relationship here is “mankind, my kind” and the existential question for this stage is “is it okay to have been me?”  But I would ask, do we really need to wait that long to get to “wisdom?”  What of those of us who might be stuck in some continuous loop of an earlier stage – maybe the “intimacy versus isolation” stage. . . .

There is also the question of regret, depression and other negative emotions can have on that backward glance at our lives.  But what of those who are still looking forward – perhaps in recognition of Kierkegaard’s observation that while life can only be understood backwards, it must be lived forwards?

The Window.  One of the hallmarks of Erikson’s ninth stage – whether it is an extension or an additional category, is a term which Joan Erikson has provided: gerotranscendence – you can read more about it in this article from the Journal of Aging Studies.

Geotranscendance (yes, I’m spelling it with “dance” on the end, it’s been done before!) is about building on that strength of wisdom from the eighth stage and looking forward and beyond oneself, hence the transcendence.  I thought of the tee-shirt I’ve seen a few times: “old age is not for sissies” when I was reading about Joan Erikson’s description in the ninth state of the daily dystonic element of despair.  Perhaps this means of transcendence is in this respect a means of survival, of going beyond the despair and dis-integration, to look beyond the self for broader meaning.  Maybe I’m straying off-topic. . . .

So how do the eighth and ninth stages factor into the socially-acceptable and praiseworthy paternalism of mandatory reporting statute regarding elder abuse?  Well, I’m afraid they go back to that death denial and youth glorification temple that is such a fixture in our daily modern life.  When we look in the mirror – who is it that we see?  When we look at elders, who is it that we see?  What is our relationship to the world and how do we make sense of it?  First, we give it a name.

Every Judgment is a naming, and every judgment is (or more precisely, potentially is) a name, can become a name.

                                                        Sergius Bulgakov

More about naming and unnaming in the mirror and through the window in my next installment. . . .

 ©Barbara Cashman  2014   www.DenverElderLaw.org

 

Elderhood as a Life Stage: The Power of Naming (part I)

 

My Mom, the Nurse Cadet

My Mom, the Nurse Cadet

 

In this first post I look at the power of naming and how we often use and misuse it in the context of challenges presented by aging.  In the second post I will explore a collective means of naming in the context of elder abuse and reporting of it as a kind of naming and identity.

Ageism, like all forms of discrimination, limits the respect and dignity afforded to a group of people and likewise, reflectively, diminishes the same qualities on those persons who are projecting those judgments and limitations onto others.

With great power comes great responsibility.

Voltaire (1694-1778), Spiderman (2002)

Each of us has the power to understand, see, respond to, have compassion for, and be with another person.  The problem is many of us don’t often see it as a “power.”  Sometimes we view compassion as a weakness!  If we think of it – that power – as a way of acting, we often see it in the context of “power over” in the social hierarchical and “currency” context of our interaction, like when someone asks themselves before responding to a person before them “how important is this person to me, to my agenda?”  Another kind of power is the power with others, which can be as simple as a small family unit or a work group agreeing on the desirability of getting a common problem solved or a challenge effectively managed in a way that will work for everyone.   This is where the naming comes in (I know you were starting to wonder)….

Dacher Keltner of UC Berkeley lists one definition of compassion as

the feeling that arises when you are confronted with another’s suffering and feel motivated to relieve that suffering.

We often focus on compassion as including only suffering, but I would submit that compassion also properly includes compassionate joy, the ability to feel and share another’s happiness and joy.  The Buddhists call this “sympathetic joy.”

The power of naming, which contains the secret of our relationship to our world, is not something most of us take the time to ponder.  One of the advantages of conscious Elderhood or second-half-of-life thinking, is that we can take a bigger picture view which doesn’t threaten our position in life.  Still, elderhood presents many challenges for all of us, and it is not always an easy transition from the earliest part of our lives, even if we derive meaning from those three sources identified by Viktor Frankl in Man’s Search for Meaning: purposeful work, love, and courage in the face of difficulty.  I have referred to Richard Rohr’s book in previous posts, but Falling Upward is worth mentioning again in his approach that the loss of certain things as a gain of others.

Old age –  how we look at these things, who is the problem, what is the problem, whose problem is it, how will the problem be solved or remain unsolved, whether we consider ourselves part of the problem or part of the solution. . .   I think it is safe to say that people aren’t fond of thinking more than is necessary, and that we prefer simple words that are easy to pronounce and understand.

Often we find that as soon as a concept is labeled, it changes how people perceive it.  This is consistent with the linguistic version of the Heisenberg effect of the perceiver on the perceived and vice versa.  This is the outward-looking part of the naming.

Naming and unnaming in the context of Elderhood is in part concerned with the losses sustained as one ages, and invariably many of us focus on those exclusively, ignoring the positive and liberating effects of entering into the second half of life (for those of us embracing that stage), a time of meaning, when we realize that all of our life is our life’s path.  In using our power to name – both ourselves and others, we can often misname and unnamed.  Let’s have a look at a couple examples.

How do we name the losses of aging?  Where do these losses take us?  Is it to a place of grief and mourning or is it to a place of understanding oneself as a person who will die one day, or more likely, a mix of the two.  There are many losses in old age, and many opportunities for grieving.  Do we take the opportunity to grieve and move on, to open to new life or do we hold on to what was and will never be again?

How do we misname the challenging aspects?  Where many people suffer from a chronic disease – such as Parkinson’s or diabetes, the answer to “who am I?” can often change so that a person becomes an embodiment of a disease.  I think nearly all of us bristle at such a prospect or practice.

Stay tuned, in my next installment I’ll explore how we often unname an elder or some other person with dementia.

 ©Barbara Cashman 2013     www.DenverElderLaw.org

When Death is Not Death: a Reprise

 

Waterton Waters

Waterton Waters

Perhaps a more appropriate title would be “when dying is not dying.”  This is a follow up to an earlier post about “brain death” for organ donation purposes and how the use of medical technology can ethically complicate a person’s dying.  The Boston Globe had a good article about a source of interference for a terminally ill person’s otherwise natural dying process: the implantable cardioverter defibrillator.  Turns out that prolonging life for someone with a chronic disease can have repercussions when the person is dying of a terminal illness or other natural causes.  Read the article “Lifesaving implants complicate end-of-life care” here.  Another troubling issue which is broader than that of the ICD deactivation is when a pacemaker-dependent patient is terminally ill and requests deactivation of the device.  Doctors distinguish between the ethical decisions of these two actions.  You can read a medical journal article about the 2008 Guidelines for Device-Based Therapy of Cardiac Rhythm Abnormalities here.

The implants are basically small, internal versions of the paddles that emergency rooms use to shock patients’ malfunctioning hearts – and these are saving many lives. But in some cases they also are making the act of dying, the process of letting go and saying goodbye much harder, because they are forcing terminally ill patients and families to make wrenching decisions about turning them off. The devices subject some dying patients to painful jolts and can prolong their suffering.  These jolts to a person’s otherwise dying body are also traumatizing to loved ones and can make the dying process more difficult in unanticipated ways.

Implants aren’t the only complications for end of life issues facing an individual or family.  TPN or total parenteral nutrition has served to extend many lives which would have been shortened due to short bowel syndrome or intestinal failure.  As a medical means of extending life for these conditions, this type of intravenous feeding can also complicate end of life care when a person is suffering the effects of another disease process.  Dialysis can stave off renal failure for many years for those with failing kidneys.  What used to be fatal heart attacks and strokes can be more effectively treated in many elders, but the interventions may result in chronic complications or cognitive decline.

Health care POAs and advance directives are much more important for persons with these implants.  Prolonging life and not impeding dying – how do we separate out the two? Is aging and death a natural part of life or is it something that should be opposed as some would argue, essentially that we should be pursuing a “cure” for aging?

I have previously written a post (or two) about the medical definition of “a good death,” and will avoid a discussion of the difficult distinction between quantity versus quality in end of life care.  These issues affect individuals and family members of elders in a much larger proportion, but the issues surrounding medical intervention at the end of a life are issues for all ages of people, children and young adults on life support are much more challenging to us in many ways because these deaths go against the “natural order” of a parent dying before a child.

How to determine what would be a good death is a very individual choice which doctors and medical providers can help facilitate, but they are not the ones properly in charge of making such a determination for a patient or a patient’s family.  Thinking about these difficult questions now and discussing feelings about these scenarios with family members can lighten a potential burden immeasurably.    So what can you do now to start the difficult conversation?  I still like the American Bar Association’s Consumer’s Toolkit for Health Care Advance Planning because it has great topics to break down the process into manageable conversations around issues like Are Some Conditions Worse than Death? and Personal Priorities and Spiritual Values Important to Your Medical Decisions.

These questions are best discussed by family members in advance of a crisis.  The discussion can avert or greatly diminish potential conflict among family members with differing opinions.  Don’t put this opportunity off until it’s too late, especially when so many helpful resources exist to help you get started.

©Barbara Cashman  2014   www.DenverElderLaw.org